Posts

Social Semiotics

Image
Whether you know it or not, you have seen examples of social semiotics many times. Social semiotics is a multifaceted approach that investigates how meaning is created and communicated through signs and symbols within social and cultural contexts. It is said that social semiotics was influenced by Michael Halliday. And it aims to decode the ways in which different signs, such as language, images, gestures, and objects, convey meaning within societies. This methodology is important because it unveils the intricate interplay between communication, culture, and power structures, showing how individuals interpret and negotiate meaning in different social settings. There are several rules within social semiotics. One is called multimodality, it means recognizing that communication involves multiple different modes, like images and languages, working together to convey a certain meaning. There is semiotic resources, that focuses on understanding different resources used in communication and ...

Larries Vs Antis

Image
The argument I chose to write about is one that I found on Reddit between larries and antis. For context larries are people who believe that two of the members in One Direction, Louis Tomlinson and Harry Styles, were secretly dating while in the band. And antis are those who do not believe that. I chose this argument because I know about the topic. Although the one chosen is fairly short, there have been many and there are even more examples in the comment section.   Link to Reddit argument:   https://www.reddit.com/r/larrystylinson/comments/r6fxio/a_fight_between_an_anti_and_a_larrie/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button     They argue negatively, and these are three examples of it:  Name Calling: In the example used they call the other an idiot, or delusional.  Sarcasm: Sarcasm never helps get your point across, it can cause further confusion. Jumping to Conclusions: In terms of this ...

Toulmin Method

Image
In today’s digital age, the Toulmin method stands out as a powerful framework for breaking down arguments and forming persuasive messages. Its structured method, which includes claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal, offers a robust toolkit for assessing and engaging with discussions online. Yet, effectively applying this method in the digital sphere requires a deep understanding of its elements and the specific challenges inherent to online interactions. At its essence, the Toulmin method acts as a blueprint for effective argumentation. It starts with the claim, the primary assertion supported by relevant data. The warrant then connects this data to the claim by explaining their logical relationship. Additionally, backing provides further support, qualifiers acknowledge any limitations, and rebuttals anticipate opposing viewpoints. For example, in a debate on climate change, one might claim that human activities significantly impact global warming. Supporting data coul...

Research Podcast

Image
The podcast I selected focuses on interpersonal relationships, more specifically it talks about how jealousy can poison the relationship. In our class we have talked about interpersonal relationships quite a bit as well. I will be writing what I learned from the podcast and I will write about how it relates to what I have learned in my class.  The name of the podcast I selected is called “The Poisonous affects of jealousy in your relationship.” I found this podcast on apple and you can see it  by clicking this link . As stated this podcast focuses on how jealousy affects relationships. She says “jealousy is one of the biggest relationship destroyers.” (Isabella, 2019) And she states how protectiveness and jealousy in term of relationships are very different, mostly because jealousy is associated with destructive behaviors. When someone is full of jealousy they tend to act selfish and controlling, they also tend to jump to conclusions and assume things that just aren’t true. Sh...

The Battle For Public Opinion

Image
  In todays world, social media platforms have powerful battlegrounds where individuals, organizations, and even governments compete for public opinion. This transformation in public opinion formation and communication strategies has profound implications for society, democracy, and interpersonal relationships. I have made bullet points showing the key factors, some potential implications, examples, and ethical considerations for people to keep in mind. Some of the key factors contributing to the online battle for public opinion are: Viral trends: Online campaigns gain most of their momentum through viral trends. These campaigns can capture the publics attention and drive conversations on important topics. Accessibility: Anyone with internet access can participate in public discourse. And inclusivity on the internet empowers individuals, giving them a chance to voice their perspectives, regardless of their background. Rapid spread of information: Social media allows information to ...

Starbucks’s Online Communication

Image
      Starbucks is a very large and successful business. And Starbucks has traditionally done a good job of using its website and social media platforms to engage with customers. For example, their website provides information about their products, promotions, and locations. On social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram, they actively share updates about new menu items and engage with customers through posts and responses.    When you go to the Starbucks website you’ll see that it follows a typical format:    - Top: The top of the homepage features the Starbucks logo, a navigation menu to access different sections of the site (like menu or rewards), and a prominent search bar.    - Middle: In the middle section, you'll find featured promotions, new products, and a section for the Starbucks Rewards program.    - Bottom: The bottom contains links to legal information, store locator, and contact details. https://www.starbuc...

Digital Natives and Immigrants

Image
Prensky’s Digital Native/Immigrant Divide: Marc Prensky has made the terms “digital natives” and “digital immigrants” to categorize people based on how familiar they are with technology. Digital natives are people born into a world with technology and can effortlessly navigate their way through it. Digital immigrants are those who adapted later in life, but still often struggle to keep up with it.  This divide between the two affects how students learn. Digital natives are more comfortable with technology, benefiting with immediate access to information, multimedia, and interactive platforms. Which can lead to increased engagement and personalized learning experiences. While digital immigrants face more challenges. They don’t have full potential of technology, and they struggle to connect with the digital native students. The divide between the two creates a gap in the teachers expectations for their students, and makes the teaching/learning dynamics difficult to access. https://ww...